Server-vs klientgenererade webbapplikationer : Enjämförelse ur ett usabilityperspektiv

Sammanfattning: This paper takes a closer look and conducts a   comparison of two different approaches to generate interactivity of web   applications today, namely server or client side generation. The overall   purpose of the comparison is to help determine which approach is best suited   to generate maximum business advantage to least possible time cost. The   perspective used to measure this is usability seen from a developer's point   of view. The time it takes to acquaint oneself with a framework may vary on   several aspects and therefore a demarcated scenario has been set up and   individual parts have been evaluated side by side in the frameworks JSF and   Angular.io. Together with interviews of developer’s gathered experiences a   result has been possible to assemble. This result speaks neither for or   against either of the two approaches as both techniques have their own   advantages and disadvantages. What has been most prominent in the comparison   however is the introduction of the design pattern Model View Controller in a   framework for client side generation as Angular.io. This results in a similar   experience in usability as in a corresponding framework for server side   generation as JSF, which is good in an efficiency point of view. Still, the   lack of relevant error messages is experienced as a big problem in client   side frameworks and is an issue which stands out negatively in the   comparison.