Ord står mot ord : En kritisk diskursanalys av ärenden rörande kränkande behandling på grundskolor i Uppsala kommun 2016

Sammanfattning: The purpose of this paper was to examine how the bullying discourse differs depending on if the person bullying is a student or an employee at the school. Cases from Skolinspektionen and Barn- och elevombudsmannen was analysed using Faircloughs three dimensional critical discourse analysis to be able to identify how the disocurse differs depending on who has been bullying. The analysis showed that the discourse do differ between when it is a student and when it is a employee at the school that bullies. The agency of the employees were hidden and their potentielly bully-like actions were rationalized while the agency of students that bully was clear.