Normalitet i det goda samhället
Sammanfattning: The aim of this study was to gain an understanding of how experts and non-experts relate to prenatal diagnosis regarding normality and the idea of what makes a good society. The method chosen for this study was qualitative content analysis. The sample used for the study includes 38 debate articles brought from Swedish daily newspapers. The results show little distinction between experts and non-experts. Small differences are shown in their ways of expressing their opinions, but regarding normality and values of what makes a good society in relation to prenatal diagnosis, the content is similar between the two.
HÄR KAN DU HÄMTA UPPSATSEN I FULLTEXT. (följ länken till nästa sida)