Erfarenhetsåterföring inom byggentreprenader. : Framtagning av en modell för att effektivisera erfarenhetsåterföringen mellan byggprojekt.

Sammanfattning: Purpose: The construction sector has for many years been criticized for being ineffective, non-competitive and being expensive. Swedish construction firms needs to work with their experience feedback systems. But unfortunately it lacks tradition and experiences with this kind of work with experience feedback. Work in the construction sector usually is defined as craftmanship. Which means that errors are corrected as quickly as possible without understanding and analyzing the underlying causes of the errors and thus be able to control their production processes. The purpose of this study is to bring foward a theoretical model over information flows that could increase the efficiency of the experience feedback between construction projects. Method: The study’s approach was through a qualitative case study. Qualitative case study was chosen due to the need of a thorough analysis of the problem. The report’s theoretical framework is produced from a literature study which focused on experience feedback, knowledge management, incentives and motivation. The empirical accumulation consisted of six interviews conducted by the type of semi-structured and a document analysis. Findings: In the current situation oral feedback is the most common experience feedback from the construction site. Systems regarding experience feedback is not used due to lack of knowledge of the systems and information about how the work with experience feedback should be done is non-existent. Work with experience feedback does not take place continuously during the project and does not have any shall batch. There is no structure, responsibilities and guidelines regarding how the work with experience feedback should be done. This leads to uncertainty among service men concerning the definition of experience feedback. Due to that no information has been released to service men about how the systems works or what’s in the systems motivation to work with the experience feedback systems are failing. Implications: The conclusions of this report is that a knowledge bank should be made available to all service men within the company, from the knowledge bank experiences are reported in and out. During the project continuosly work should be done regarding experience feedback through meetings and at each construction site a responsible person should handle the reporting of experiences. There should be clear structures and guidelines of what the work with experience feedback includes. A responsible person should be handling the knowledge bank and ensure that only relevant information stores in the knowledge bank. Limitations: The report concerns incentive and motivation which is applicable in any organization, this promotes a generally valid result for the case study. The report delimitates from all database structures which are considered as positive due to the time it takes to analyze and make these structures. This would have indirectly been taking time from the analysis of the experience feedback systems and would make the study’s result less credible.