Did you notice that? A comparison between auditory and vibrotactile feedback in an AR environment

Sammanfattning: There are different ways to interact with different hardware, therefore it is important to have an understanding about what factors that affect the experience when designing interactions and interfaces. This study focuses on exploring how auditory and vibrotactile feedback are perceived by the users when they interact in a virtual AR environment. An application was developed to the AR glasses Magic Leap with different interactions, both passive and active. An experimental study was conducted with 28 participants that got to interact in this virtual environment. The study included two parts. First the participants interacted in the virtual environment where they did a think aloud. Thereafter they were interviewed. There were a total of three test cases. One with only auditory feedback, one with vibrotactile feedback, and a third that had both auditory and vibrotactile feedback. Seven of the 28 participants acted as a control group that did not have any feedback to their interactions. The study shows that using only vibrotactile feedback creates different impressions depending on earlier experiences with the same AR environment. Using only auditory feedback created an atmosphere that were close to reality. Having both feedbacks active at the same time reduced the noticed feedback and some interactions were here not even noticed at all. Passive interactions were more noticed than active interactions in all cases.