Jämförelse mellan halvlätt trä och tung betongkonstruktion i projektet Anläggaren 3 : Koldioxidutsläpp, kostnad och inverkan av geografisk position på energiåtgång

Sammanfattning: The house Anläggaren 3 was investigated for energy consumption, carbon dioxideemissions and investment cost by setting up the project as two types of construction. The first alternative wasa semi-light construction where the outer walls, the middle joists and the ceiling were of wood, while the second alternative was a heavy construction where thepreviously mentioned parts consisted of concrete.The chosen approach was to review energy needs through several calculations with theprogram IDA ICE. Climate impact was investigated with statistics from SMHI and severalenergy simulations with IDA ICE. The investment cost was generated with the Bidconprogram. More detailed data for the building components of the two constructions wasused in the energy calculation program.The semi-light wood construction for the Anläggaren 3 required less material than theconcrete construction to achieve almost the same U-values. The two design alternatives were hardly affected by geographical location differences and climate change, but energyconsumption had a more even profile for the southern cities than the northern ones. Aninvestment in the semi-light wood construction is preferable in Skellefteå as it is cheaper, takes less time and emits less carbon dioxide than the heavy concrete construction. Concrete is in its original condition better from the mold and fire safety point of view, often withstands more stress and be formed in some situations more than wood.