Mobility Management - smart och hållbart eller ett spel för gallerierna? : Boendes upplevelser, attityder & beteenden i förhållande till mjuka åtgärder i bostadsprojekt med låga parkeringstal

Sammanfattning: In contemporary society, a common aim is to increase sustainable travel in order to foster the ecological environment. This is to be made possible by a transformation in travel modes from car to public transport, walking and cycling. Stockholm, which is the city focused on in this study, is currently growing. This further results in increased demands for infrastructure and housing. Municipalities have started to allow real estate actors to include Mobility Management measures in housing development in exchange for lower parking demands, to further support the modal change. Such measures can for example be defined as memberships in carpools, cycle pools, information and knowledge exchange. Thus, such implementations are stated as useful methods, however, the effects are poorly assessed and are difficult to measure. According to this, the purpose of this study is to examine relationships between residents' attitudes and behaviours and Mobility Management measures in newly developed housing projects with low parking numbers. The three projects of Flora, Nor and Kavringen were selected, due to the possibility of comparison. The focus has chosen to be on residents' perspectives, as they are the definitive users of the measures. Theories of attitudes and habits have further been used as a framework in order to obtain a greater understanding of the residents' relationship to the measures and to sustainable travel in general. The results, which are based on surveys and interviews, show a variation in attitudes towards sustainable travel and travel modes among the users between and within the study objects. Many appear to treasure sustainable traveling in order to foster the environment and according to this, they seem to have advantageous attitudes towards such travel modes. More residents seem to also travel with sustainable modes. However, other factors than supporting the environment seem to steer respondents in their modal choices. Several residents do also value car use to a high extent. With regards to the Mobility Management measures, the average usage has appeared to be low. This seems to be a result of a shortage in information, logistics, accessibility and in addition, the measures appear to not be competitive enough to respond to the users' needs. Based on demographic factors, time, economy, comfort, accessibility to service and work and the Covid 19 pandemic, such aspects seem to affect users' modal choices more than for them to travel in a way to support the ecological environment.