Riskanalys med avseende på arbetssättet K1

Sammanfattning: The construction industry is in third place concerning the number of yearly accidents and in secondplace concerning accidents with deadly outcomes in Sweden according to statistics (Arbetsmiljöverket2017a). This is an issue that Skanska, NCC, PEAB, Sveriges Byggindustrier and Byggnads isdetermined to work on to improve. A work procedure to identify and address safety risks during theplanning- and projection phase of a construction project has been developed with support from SBUF(Holm, Lidgren, Montecinos 2013). The work procedure is designed to first identify the safety risksthat is present for the current project with the help from a checklist. Then if the risks can’t beeliminated in the projection phase the risk will be highlighted on the construction drawings. A problemthat was discovered during the implementation of the work procedure in a construction project wasthat too many and not relevant risks was highlighted on the construction drawings. The purpose ofthis report is to produce underlying instructions to the planners of the construction project so thatthey can make use of the work procedure in the most appropriate manner. This report is written bystudents from Högskolan I Halmstad in co-operation with Skanska Teknik in Gothenburg. This reportis limited to new office and housing construction projects.To produce a result, we have conducted two comprehensive interviews as well as surveys answered byproduction managers. These interviews and surveys led to the conclusion that for the work procedureto succeed it’s important to have a good composition in the group that will work together with thechecklist and the identification of safety risks. The group is recommended to be composed of planners,project managers, safety representatives and if possible experienced workers. Another important aspectto make the work procedure successful is to make the checklist reflect the conditions of theconstruction projects that are being processed. Two construction project is almost never the sameconditions which doesn’t lend itself well to making a work procedure that handles all different casesof projects. The results also reveal that construction engineers and planners lack knowledge andeducation concerning work environment on construction sites. The results we have produced will alsohelp planners of construction projects that will use this specific work procedure to know which of thesafety risks are relevant to be highlighted on the construction drawings. We have also proposed someareas that needs more researched to make the work procedure more complete.