Värdering av anbud vid kommunala upphandlingar av byggprojekt

Sammanfattning: The thesis deals with evaluation of tenders for communal construction procurement. Each year the public procurement equals the value of millions of Swedish kronors, of which construction projects makes up a large proportion. These projects tend to often exceed their budgets. The aim with the thesis is to investigate if there are faults in the tender evaluation process. The theoretical framework for the study partly consists of a review on how the communal evaluation work is described in law and practice. A qualitative methodology is applied in the study where four procurement workers are interviewed. Similarities and differences between evaluation work in practice and what is described in the study's theoretical framework is been analyzed. One of several conclusions of the study is that the choice of contractual form for the construction work often determines the choice of procurement form. Hence the person that works with modeling of tender documents should be well acquainted with the construction industry. A boundary that was set for the study is that it geographically covers Sweden exclusively. Suggestions for further research include investigating why international construction companies bidding in Sweden on communal construction projects do not seem to function properly.