Tiggeriförbud i Sverige: förenligt med individens frihet? En normativ givet att-analys av riksdagsdebatten om ett införande av ett nationellt tiggeriförbud
Sammanfattning: In 2016, the Swedish government released a comprehensive report stating that since 2012, the presence of beggars had become a common sight in towns and cities throughout Sweden. Furthermore, most of the beggars came from Romania and Bulgaria, where they faced discrimination and had few opportunities to support themselves and their families Later, in 2018, the administrative court made a ruling which allowed the municipality of Vellinge to forbid the “passive collection of money” in certain geographical areas. The adjudication was both applauded as well as condemned. The question of prohibiting begging is clearly a subject for debate. This Bachelor's essay investigates whether a national prohibition of begging can be justified in Sweden in 2020 with regards to the freedom of the individual. It does so, by a normative analysis where the legitimacy of an impulsion to prohibit begging is examined in relation to the normative logics of deontologism and consequentialism. The theory is mainly constructed by chosen parts of the work by the political theorists John Stuart Mill and Isaiah Berlin. The findings suggest that a national prohibition of beggary cannot be viewed as acceptable in relation to the freedom of the individual and deontologism but can on the other hand be justified regarding consequentialism.
HÄR KAN DU HÄMTA UPPSATSEN I FULLTEXT. (följ länken till nästa sida)