Uganda, LRA och ICC: mer än man ser vid första anblicken
Sammanfattning: The people of northern Uganda has for decades been entangled in a conflict between, on the one hand, crude government forces and, on the other hand, the brutal rebel organization the Lord’s Resistance Army led by the ruthless Joseph Kony. In 2003 the Ugandan government referred the situation to the International Criminal Court with the official stance that their intention was to, through capturing the LRA’s leaders, bring an end to the conflict and secure peace and security to the people of northern Uganda. These intensions, however, are disputed and the goodwill of the Ugandan government is not as self-evident as they attempt to portray it. Neither is the involvement of the International Criminal Court in the conflict undisputably positive and it may arguably pose a danger to the swift seizure of hostilities and violence. Through an argumentation of analysis on the Referral of the situation concerning the Lord’s Resistance Army, submitted by the Republic of Uganda to the International Criminal Court in 2003, this paper attempts to highlight the difficulties in providing a sufficiently unbiased narrative of a conflict through the process of a state’s referral of a situation to the International Criminal Court as laid down in the Rome Statute. It is shown that the absence of additional perspectives on the situation makes the need for scrutinizing argumentation essential in order to be able to create an independent view on, and understanding for, a conflict situation. Keywords: narrative, Yoweri Museveni, the Lord’s Resistance Army, the International Criminal Court, the Acholi-people, Uganda
HÄR KAN DU HÄMTA UPPSATSEN I FULLTEXT. (följ länken till nästa sida)