Socialt ansvarsfulla fonder under olika marknadsstadier: positivt eller negativt?

Sammanfattning: Research has shown that the selection criteria, so-called screens, of socially responsible funds (SRF) affect their financial performance. The difference is particularly distinguishable during market crisis, where the exclusion of unethical industries (negative screening) has proven to be an inferior strategy compared to selecting companies with good social performance (positive screening). Few academic papers compare SRF with different screens to each other under market turmoil, instead comparing them to conventional funds. We examined the Swedish fund market during crisis and non-crisis by dividing SRF according to their screens. The results indicated that the financial performance between SRF with positive and negative screening was not significantly different during neither the crisis nor non-crisis period. In contrast to previous literature, SRF did not exhibit any risk reducing characteristics during market crisis.