Samspel och Samhörighet : Vad lärare gör i sin praktik som skapar goda förutsättningar för en god lärare- elevrelation i träningsskolan

Sammanfattning: Abstract Research shows that the prevailing view is that the relationship between teacher and pupil is fundamental to learning. Although most studies emphasize the crucial importance of a positive relationship between teacher and student, it also highlights that more knowledge is needed about what actually happens when a teacher acts relationally. The purpose of this study is therefore to elucidate what teachers do in their practice which creates good conditions for a good teacher-student relationship with students incompulsory school for children with severe learning disabilities.The purpose is achieved by answering the questions: What good conditions for a good teacher-student relationship can be determined based on how teachers act in the teaching practice with students incompulsory school for children with severe learning disabilities? What good conditions for a good teacher-student relationship with students incompulsory school for children with severe learning disabilities can be determined based on the descriptions of three teaching teachers? and How can good prerequisites for a good teacher-student relationship with students inthe practice ofcompulsory school for children with severe learning disabilities be understood from a two-dimensional interpretation framework? The relational perspective according to Aspelin (2013, 2016) is the perspective used to interpret the study's empirics. According to this perspective, a two-dimensional interpretation framework consisting of two approaches, which Aspelin (2013) calls pedagogical approaches and pedagogical meetings, is required. In order to balance these, differentiation skills (Aspelin, 2016) are also required to have the ability to regulate proximity and distance in the relationship. Observational studies and interview studies were conducted to find answers to the study's questions. The study results show that the two survey methods complement each other, since the results of the study methods do not contradict each other, but rather substantiate and supplement, the assumption is made that this contributed to a more complex picture of relationship building. The methods illustrate the topic from two different perspectives, what the teacher does and what the teacher describes it to do. The result reflects the different ways of creating the conditions for relationships that the study's review of previous research shows. Based on a combination of the results of the study methods, it can be seen that teachers are often in the social and interpersonal dimension at the same time and that they influence and presuppose one another. Taken together, the study's results can be interpreted as the fact that specialist teachers' knowledge of the pedagogical work and their ability to self-insight is the basis of their work in building teacher-student relationships. And that differentiation creates the conditions for the teachers' ability to differentiate between private and professional as well as the prerequisite for the student to take a place as an individual.