Begravningsvapen i ett urval kyrkor. Restaurering i ett idéhistoriskt och etnologiskt perspektiv

Sammanfattning: Funeral Coats of arms were made to be carried in funeral processions. Church restorations have in recent years increased the interest in these objects. The purpose of this essay is to describe these 16 - and 17th century objects and to assess the cause of deterioration and the reasons behind restorations made to them. One important aim was to find out how churches dealt with these cult objects and to be able to recognize common and rarely occurring damage and later performance. A case study was carried out. The likely reason for the discovered phenomena is a recurring theme in the essay. Books about heraldic shields were used as written sources. ATA was used as a source for earlier documentation of this group of objects. The paint layer is the key to the understanding of these objects. Dating a painted area is essential for distinguishing original from restored coatings, truth from speculation. Historical objects can be valuable historical keys, but they do not always fit as pieces of a puzzle to the yet undiscovered. The first part of the thesis describes the different sections of a Weapon. This is done to gain necessary knowledge of historical function, content and to map out possible damage and restoration. How and why restoration has been performed such as effects of climate and decrease in value of the metals but also circumstances such as changes of fashion and political decisions is discussed. These factors determine what is today left. The interpretation of artistic painting innovations, the aesthetic mind and how to value and construct history is also dealt with. A conclusion of this study on funeral coat of arms is that conservation requires a never ending reflection over the present and honesty towards the past and future. Although conservators have a wide knowledge span of craftsmanship as well as historical knowledge of technical materials, conservation decisions by professional conservators should be based on cooperative work with scientists and other experts. A conclusion is the use of the ethical rules depends on our interpretation of objects. This is essential for judging and making the right decision on what and how to preserve and save. The goal is always to reach a long lasting and true conservation.