Neutralitetsprincipen mellan upplåtelseformerna med hänsyn till risker - ett diskussionsperspektiv : En analys av neutralitetsmålet mellan upplåtelseformerna bostadsrätt och hyresrätt från ett riskperspektiv

Sammanfattning: This thesis aims to investigate whether it is possible to achieve neutrality between two selected forms of tenancy, condominium and tenancy. A risk perspective is assumed in the thesis and its starting point is thus to compare the significant risks with condominium compared tenancy. The fundamental rights and obligations in each form of lease are claimed and the risks are presented accordingly. The risks for condominiums are significantly more and include hidden collateral, duty to investigate, confiscation, the tenant-owner association's finances and competition in tenant-owner associations. Certain problems exist mainly in the regulation of mortgages in condominiums, as there is no authority-regulated system. Condominiums associations that have been declared bankrupt are also a problematic area as the law does not regulate who has the right to apply for bankruptcy for tenant-owner associations. The person affected by the various risks is taken in a language from a buyer's perspective. Risk aspects for condominiums then compare with the risks that exist when holding a tenancy. The risks are considered to be significantly fewer and are summed up in two points, confiscation and expropriation. The meaning of the neutrality goal is described in detail and is defined in summary as a principle in Swedish housing policy that has been invented to achieve equal taxation for the various forms of tenancy. The essay concluded is that the survey suggests that the risks that a condominium is a comprehensive comparison with the risks that exist for tenancy. Which can contribute to a neutrality becoming difficult to achieve. However, in-depth research and further analysis on the subject is needed to establish this with certainty.