Beräkningsmall för väggskivor enligt Eurokoder

Sammanfattning: The regulatory framework for constructional calculations in Sweden did expire In January the 1.st, 2011.Since then the constructional regulatory that originally were composed by Boverket (BKR) has been replaced by new common range (Eurocodes) for the entire European Union. This transition has led to changes in existing rules and standards regarding dimensioning area in Grids and has forced a need for updating to structural Engineers. The new calculation system has caused time-consuming studies of the new rules and a proper understanding of all the advice and regulations for the entire profession. This study has been carried out in cooperation with the firm "Knut Jönson Ingenjörs AB i Stockholm”, that has been affected by this transition as all other consulting firms. The firm has requested for a calculation method of wall beams according to Eurocodes. The study's focus is therefore to clarify the rules and guidelines regarding the design of wall beams according to the new regulation. The calculation model describes step by step how the dimensioning has been carried out. The result indicates the amount of reinforcement, required for s a solid construction. Two different cases has been reviewed regarding reinforcement arrangement .In one case calculates the amount of reinforcement in the joist meanwhile in the other case calculate the reinforcement in the wall. To comprehend the process of dimensioning according to those different norms compares theirs calculations. Illustration of both of those calculations according to their norm has been enclosed as appendix 1-2 in the report. An Excel program has been elaborated for dimensioning of wall beams according to EK3. The firm's existing Excel-page according to BBK 044 has been applied as basis. The difference in those two dimensioning methods has been analyzed with consideration to obtained results of calculation illustration. In the analyze appears the result based on those two cases of reinforcement arrangements. It shows that tension condition in frameworks model is runes by core details and board’s height. The differences in these two calculation methods were fractional. It seems difficult to decide which method provides a more secure result but Ek seems to be more substantial.