Sökning: "b- EU"
Visar resultat 1 - 5 av 140 uppsatser innehållade orden b- EU.
1. ANSÖKNINGSTIDPUNKTEN ENLIGT MARKNADSMISSBRUKSFÖRORDNINGEN. Från vilken tidpunkt ska MAR börja tillämpas vid en nyintroduktion av aktier?
Magister-uppsats, Göteborgs universitet/Juridiska institutionenSammanfattning : I denna uppsats utreds från vilken tidpunkt som aktörer på aktiemarknaden måste efterleva EU:s marknadsmissbruksförordning (MAR) vid en nyintroduktion av aktier. Svaret beror på hur formuleringen ”ansökan om upptagande till handel [... LÄS MER
2. Is this the end of the Marks & Spencer Doctrine? - The Freedom of Establishment, Permanent Establishments and Objective Comparability
Magister-uppsats, Lunds universitet/Institutionen för handelsrättSammanfattning : The Thesis examines issues of European Corporate Tax Law and specifically the notion of the Marks & Spencer doctrine, with respect to non-resident permanent establishments. The doctrine entails the possibility for a resident company to deduct losses that were incurred by a PE, situated in another Member State. LÄS MER
3. Compatibility of Income Inclusion rule with EU Law. : GLoBE IIR and EU Law.
Magister-uppsats, Uppsala universitet/Juridiska institutionenSammanfattning : In October 2021, 137 countries and jurisdictions agreed on a common approach towards a global minimum tax of 15% on the profits of large multinational companies that is referred to as the Pillar Two Model Rules, ‘Anti Global Base Erosion’, or ‘GloBE’ Rules. This political agreement implies that member countries who wish to implement such a tax regime have to streamline its design by modelling it after the so called Global Anti-Base Erosion Proposal (‘GloBE’) that the IF has developed as ‘Pillar 2’ of its work program on tax challenges arising from the digitalization of the economy. LÄS MER
4. The рroрortionаlity аssessment under Аrticle 57(4)(d) of Directive 2014/24/EU аnd its аррlicаbility to аnticomрetitive аgreements between economic oрerаtors
Magister-uppsats, Stockholms universitet/Juridiska institutionenSammanfattning : Desрite discretionаry exclusion ground рrovided by Аrticle 57(4)(d) of the Directive 2014/24 thаt аllows contrаcting аuthorities to exclude unreliаble tenderers from рrocurement рrocedures, there is still uncertаinty regаrding both the scoрe of this рrovision аnd the рrinciрle of рroрortionаlity used by contrаcting аuthorities under the Аrticle. Thus, the аim of this Mаster Thesis is to exрlore the scoрe of the discretionаry exclusion grounds under Аrticle 57(4)(d) of Directive 2014/24/EU аnd рroрortionаlity аssessment mаde by contrаcting аuthorities through following reseаrch questions: (a) Whаt is the scoрe of Аrticle 57(4)(d) under Directive 2014/24/EU? (b) Whаt is the role of the рrinciрle of рroрortionаlity in the аssessment conducted by contrаcting аuthorities to exclude economic oрerаtors from рublic рrocurement рrocedures under Аrticle 57(4)(d) of Directive 2014/24? Whаt fаctors should be considered in the рroрortionаlity аssessment рrocess? The scoрe of Аrticle 57(4)(d) аre аgreements thаt аre mаde between economic oрerаtors thаt аre considered аs comрetitors within рublic рrocurement рrocedure аnd violаte Аrticle 101(1) TFEU bаsed on the two-stаge test, аnd since Аrticle 57(4)(d) is аn discretionаry exclusion ground of the Directive 2014/24 thаt аllows contrаcting аuthorities to exclude tenderers from рublic рrocurement рrocedures, it is uр to the contrаcting аuthorities of EU member stаtes to decide on the scoрe of the Аrticle 57(4)(d). LÄS MER
5. CSDDD, tvingande reglering och 36 § AvtL: En kritisk analys av EU:s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Direktiv (CSDDD)
Kandidat-uppsats, Lunds universitet/Juridiska institutionen; Lunds universitet/Juridiska fakultetenSammanfattning : Denna uppsats ämnar till att kartlägga företags rättsliga ansvar enligt Art 7.2.b, 7.4 och 22. LÄS MER
