Vilka faktorer påverkar aktualitetengällande onoterade företagsredovisningsrapporter?

Sammanfattning: Title: Which factors affect the timeliness of private companies’ accounting reports?Level: Bachelor’s Thesis, Business AdministrationAuthors: Lucinda Jonsson and Sarah EdlundSupervisor: Fredrik HartwigDate: 2024 - JanuaryAim: To study which factors affect the timeliness of private companies regarding thepublication of accounting information. Timeliness is a decisive qualitative criterion thataffects the usefulness of financial reporting. Information that is not current is less relevant tostakeholders. The majority of previous studies regarding the timeliness are made on listedcompanies. This is despite the fact that the proportion of private companies in Sweden aresignificantly greater than the public ones, that 99% of all European companies are private andthat private companies account for more than half of Europe's GDP. There are alsodifferences between unlisted and listed companies.Method: In this quantitative study, secondary data have been used from previous scientificarticles concerning the timeliness of private companies, in order to do a meta-analysis. Theeight articles used in the meta-analysis were suggested by our supervisor. Some articles weregathered by independent searches and chain searches. To present and interpret the resultsfrom the meta-analysis, a forest plot was generated for each result.Result & conclusion: Companies with high debt ratio will to a greater extent submit theiraccounting reports late, rather than companies with low debt ratio. Larger companies will to agreater extent submit their accounting reports late, compared to smaller companies. Therewas no significant relationship regarding audit, gender on the board and bankruptcy risk (taxdebt). Size and debt ratio do not affect the lead time.Contribution of the thesis: Doing a meta-study on private companies regarding factors thataffect timeliness, which has never been done before.Suggestion for future research: Doing a meta-analysis with values from both private andpublic companies in one meta-analysis. It’s only been done separately before. Anothersuggestion is to do this study again, but to use raw data directly from the researchers insteadof data from published articles. It’s not the same information that appears in publishedarticles, which can contribute to more precise results.Key words: Timeliness. Accounting information. Private firms. Determinants. Financialaccounting regulation.