Alternativa metoder till hägn för att minimera viltskador på hybridaspföryngringar

Sammanfattning: The purpose of the study was to find alternatives to fences by comparing the frequency of damages on different configurations of chemical treated, mechanically protected and untreated hybrid aspen seedlings, planted on agricultural land. The study also explored whether anthropogenic disturbance (proximity to roads and buildings) had any effect on the frequency of seedlings damages. The study was conducted as a quantitative study with field measurements over the course of a year, in two sample plots with hybrid aspen seedlings planted in May 2016 in Vimmerby kommun, Kalmar län. The field data was compiled into Excel and compared for differences between treatments and proximity to anthropogenic disturbance. The result showed that seedlings closer to anthropogenic disturbance showed a lower frequency of damage. There was no significant difference between the mechanical (Taimitassu) and chemical (Arbinol B) seedling protection. The highest frequency of damages occurred in the summer, peaking in July. In conclusion, when choosing a place to plant hybrid aspen, there should be anthropogenic disturbance to minimize the frequency of browsing.