En jämförelse av noggrannhet och tidseffektivitet mellan olika gångmönster med handhållen laserskanner BLK2GO i tallskog

Detta är en Kandidat-uppsats från Högskolan i Gävle/Samhällsbyggnad

Sammanfattning: Sweden consists of almost 68% of forests. It is the duty of private forest owners and companies to manage the forest in the best way and ensure sustainable forest production. Mobile laser scanning is a relatively new method for quick and easy documentation of the forest and for extracting important parameters for volume calculation and visualization using data processing.  In this study, five different walking patterns are compared when scanning a pine forest with a handheld laser scanner to evaluate which pattern that generates the most accurate data, densest point cloud, and most time efficiency. Data were collected in a well-managed pine forest west of Årsunda, in Gävleborg County during April 2023, in a 5,64-meter radius circle. The point clouds from the hand-held laser scanner and the different walking patterns were compared with data from a scanning with a terrestrial laser scanner on the same day. The diameter at breast height (DBH) for all trees in the study circle, visualization of point clouds and scanning time were compared.  The study resulted in one walking pattern that provided the lowest uncertainty and another that provided the clearest visualization. The walking pattern that resulted in the lowest uncertainty was easy and quick to both plan and execute, it also had the lowest average deviation from the reference data, only 1 cm, which can be considered very good. The second walking pattern, which generated the best visual appearance, also received a relatively small mean deviation. During the study, it became clear that certain parameters are affected by the person performing the scan and the speed at which it is performed. When it comes to presenting the results, the pros and cons depend on what the collected data is to be used for. Some walking patterns yield good results in some respects and worse in other. Therefore, all different parameters are compared in the discussion and broad results are presented.

  HÄR KAN DU HÄMTA UPPSATSEN I FULLTEXT. (följ länken till nästa sida)