Concentration of Proteins and Decrease of Salt Content in a Hydrolyzed Fermentation Broth Using Membrane Filtration

Detta är en Master-uppsats från Lunds universitet/Kemiteknik (CI)

Sammanfattning: Membrane filtration was used to concentrate proteins and decrease the salt concentration in a hydrolyzed fermentation broth. The broth was a by-product from the bacterial production and extraction of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA), that can be used to produce biobased plastics. 3 ultrafiltration-membranes, RC70PP, GR70PP and ETNA10PP from Alfa Laval Corporate AB, were evaluated at varying cross-flow velocities (CFV) of 0.3-0.5 m/s and transmembrane pressures (TMP) of 1-9 bar. High flux rates were measured, >100 L/m2h at CFV = 0.5 m/s and TMP 3-9, and the protein retention was >80% for RC70PP and >90% for GR70PP and ETNA10PP. Due to a limited amount of broth being available, it was necessary to dilute it before using it as feed in the study. This dilution appears to have significantly affected the filtration process, as there was a notable disparity between the results from this study and the results in the following concentration studies. Concentration studies were conducted with RC70PP and GR70PP, where the original, non-diluted broth was concentrated until a volume reduction of 90% was reached. Much lower flux rates, generally <20 L/m2h, were measured for both membranes. A high protein retention was achieved, of 97.1 % for RC70PP and 98.3 % for GR70PP. Both RC70PP and GR70PP measured fluxes around 5 L/m2h after the 90 % volume reduction, but due to unintentionally using a more concentrated feed in the study with GR70PP, the final protein concentration in the retentate was approximately doubled compared to the retentate of RC70PP. From this, the conclusion was drawn that GR70PP performed the best, as the flux was similar as when using RC70PP, but at a higher concentration of solutes. Diafiltration was performed with RC70PP with a diafiltration factor of 5 and this successfully decreased the conductivity in the retentate with approximately 50%, but it was at the cost of a small protein loss.

  HÄR KAN DU HÄMTA UPPSATSEN I FULLTEXT. (följ länken till nästa sida)