Measuring environmental impact in humanitarian operations : A case study of an emergency response unit for water treatment and supply from a life cycle perspective

Detta är en Master-uppsats från KTH/Hållbar utveckling, miljövetenskap och teknik

Sammanfattning: Increased extreme weather events caused by climate change and other environmental impacts, are affecting already vulnerable people predominantly. These are populations with the least resilience to disasters. As a consequence, there is a higher demand for humanitarian aid which is expected to continuously increase in the face of anthropogenic emissions. Such growing need is in turn met by growing commitment from the humanitarian sector to ensure that aid is provided by means of environmentally sustainable practices. However, to what extent the current practices of humanitarian operations are impacting the environment is not well known as very little research has been conducted on environmental sustainability in this sector. As a step towards addressing this gap, this study takes on a mixed method approach to answer how to measure the environmental impacts and what they are. The sectors’ experience of practices on how to measure impacts are mapped out and a cradle-to- grave life cycle assessment in a humanitarian operation context is conducted. Studying one of the modular tools within response operations, Emergency Response Units (ERU) for water treatment, the study identifies and highlights the impact hotspots during the whole life cycle of one deployment. As a case study to carry this out, an ERU M40 from a Swedish Red Cross deployment in Uganda 2017 is reviewed. The study reveals hotspots in transportation of water distribution during the operational phase, international transport of the equipment and production of the material. It furthermore identifies challenges and opportunities of implementing such a tool in a new context in which only few similar studies have previously been conducted. Finally, this study contributes with recommendations based on empirical evidence for how an actor like the Swedish Red Cross can mitigate their environmental impacts by implementing a holistic life cycle approach and avoid causing unintended burdens.

  HÄR KAN DU HÄMTA UPPSATSEN I FULLTEXT. (följ länken till nästa sida)