Revisionsbyråns rykte : En studie som undersöker hur rykte påverkar valet av revisionsbyrå ur ett internt och externt perspektiv

Sammanfattning: Background: Earlier research within “auditor selection” has found that reputation is a big contributing factor when clients are choosing their CPA (Certified Public Accountant) firm but there is no explanation to why this is. By combining the literature from “auditor selection” to the literature from “auditor reputation” and “corporate reputation” possible explanations can be found. By studying these areas of research two perspectives were distinguished from which the impact of the CPA firm’s reputation on the auditor selection process could be examined. With these perspectives we believe ourselves able to contribute to a deeper understanding of the relevance of reputation in the auditor selection process. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of the CPA firm’s reputation on the auditor selection process from an internal and external perspective. Method: By creating an internal and external perspective the study aims to dig deeper into the impact of reputation in an auditor selection process. These perspectives are used to categorise underlying motives for choosing a CPA firm over another. By dividing benefits gained by choosing a particular CPA firm to the external and internal perspective we can examine the the what kind of reputation has an impact on the respondents individual auditor selection process. Because of the difficulty of assessing the quality of the audit upfront the clients are forced to listen to the reputation of the CPA firms to receive desirable attributes according to the internal perspective. The external perspective believes that the CPA firm’s reputation can be used to manipulate the clients external stakeholders to benefit the client. Conclusion: This study shows that reputation is used as a selection criterion more than a determining factor in the auditor selection process. The final decision in not determined by positive reputation but a negative reputation can on the other hand terminate a CPA form from the selection process. Thereby a negative reputation is more impactful than a positive reputation on the auditor selection process. What kind of a reputation affects the client is based on their situation at the time of the selection process and their knowledge in accounting. The CPA firm’s reputation concerning all additional services was more impactful to the auditor selection process than the reputation concerning the audit. The respondents choice of a particular CPA firm were influenced by either the reputation of the CPA firm or earlier experiences of the firm. We found that earlier experiences were more impactful than a CPA firm’s reputation on the selection process.