Avancerad sökning

Hittade 2 uppsatser som matchar ovanstående sökkriterier.

1. 1. Justifying or Excusing Humanitarian Intervention? - An Examination of Whether the Law of State Responsibility Can Accommodate the Domestic Justification-Excuse Distinction

   Uppsats för yrkesexamina på avancerad nivå, Lunds universitet/Juridiska institutionen; Lunds universitet/Juridiska fakulteten

   Författare :Isabella Krvavac; [2022]
   Nyckelord :Folkrätt; public international law; analogi; analogy; rättfärdigande omständigheter; justifications; ursäktande omständigheter; excuses; humanitär intervention; humanitarian intervention; Law and Political Science;

   Sammanfattning : In defense of humanitarian intervention, it has been claimed to be ‘illegal but justified’ and ‘illegal but excused’. One way of understanding such claims is that humanitarian intervention is illegal since existing primary rules of international law prohibit such intervention. LÄS MER

3. 2. Ryms det anticipatoriska självförsvaret inom ramen för en tredje stats suveränitet?

   Kandidat-uppsats, Lunds universitet/Juridiska institutionen; Lunds universitet/Juridiska fakulteten

   Författare :Isabella Krvavac; [2020]
   Nyckelord :Folkrätt; anticipatoriskt självförsvar; självförsvar; suveränitet; tredje stat; territorialstat; jus ad bellum.; Law and Political Science;

   Sammanfattning : The year 2020 started with Soleimani, the Iranian general, being killed in an American drone attack. The attack raised the question of anticipatory self-defence and its legitimacy, which has been a controversial subject ever since the time of Hugo Grotius. The prohibition of the use of force in art. LÄS MER