Sustainable investment strategies and the impact of the EU taxonomy : A study on Swedish institutional investors

Sammanfattning: This thesis investigates the current sustainable investment strategy of Swedish institutional investors that are not covered by the EU Taxonomy and how the Taxonomy will affect their work with sustainable investments. As a basis, 7 semi-structured interviews have been conducted. The respondent group consists of three institutional asset owners and four Swedish public pension funds. The former group, not having asset management as their core business, mainly use negative and norms-based screening whereas the latter are professional investors and they combine several other SRI strategies. The difference in SRI strategies between the investor groups is mainly explained by the professional investors having a more extensive ESG risk awareness and a greater organizational capacity. Except the screening strategies, the following SRI strategies are commonly used; corporate engagement and shareholder action, sustainability themed investing and ESG integration which is in line with the literature. Though, the institutional investors in this study are employing positive/best-in-class screening to a much less extent than the literature states. The investors agree with the literature and have a general positive view of the implementation of the Taxonomy and that there is a need of a consistent, global reporting standard. However, the investors raise criticism of the EU Taxonomy only including certain sectors, European countries and the exclusive climate focus which decreases the utility and is in line with the current literature. None of the interviewed investors has implemented the EU Taxonomy in their work with sustainable investments yet and do not believe that the EU Taxonomy will affect their investment strategies. This contradicts the current literature where private investors see the EU Taxonomy as a long awaited common framework with standardized KPI:s which will improve comparability on the market. However, a majority of the investors believe that the EU Taxonomy will- or probably will affect their work with sustainable investments in the future as an additional reporting tool where the professional investors show a greater belief than the asset owners. This study shows that Swedish institutional investors will probably use the EU Taxonomy as a reporting framework in the future but the implementation will not change the investor's SRI strategies. Professional investors are more likely to report according to the EU Taxonomy than institutional asset owners. Furthermore, the Taxonomy's level of impact depends on the investor’s Taxonomy knowledge; a more extensive knowledge increases the possibility to start reporting according to the Taxonomy.