Life cycle energy optimization as a tool to compare and evaluate the optimal design in the automotive industry

Sammanfattning: Fiber reinforced plastics are composite materials that offer a lower weight, while still mechanically perform at least as good as conventional materials such as steel. This makes them attractive for the automotive industry since the implementation of them in e.g. a car frame would enable the manufacturers to sell a more fuel efficient vehicle to the customer. The manufacturing of composites is however more energy intense than for steel and the recycling capabilities are limited. This encourages the car designer to regard the product from a macro-perspective, spanning from the extraction of the resources needed to produce the material, to the phase where the product which the material constitutes is disposed. By analyzing such a macro-perspective, the life cycle energy of a product system can be estimated. Since the life cycle energy is correlated to the component design, an optimization problem can be established where the objective function to be minimized is the total life cycle energy. The component design can be expressed in terms of optimization design variables, yielding that the minimum energy is achieved by the optimal design. This methodology is called life cycle energy optimization (LCEO). The aim of this thesis is to apply this method and present a comparison between different materials and recycling strategies for a load carrying frame component provided by Volvo Cars. The materials studied are carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP), glass fiber sheet moulding compound (GF-SMC) and conventional steel. A Python model consisting of five life cycle phases where each phase was described by a function was implemented. Each function uses the component geometry and material properties as an input and gives the energy of the phase as an output. By summing the outputted energies, the life cycle energy is obtained. The distribution of the results is visualized with bar plots. The results show that the least energy demanding option is to manufacture the component in GF-SMC and process the end-of-life product mechanically. If the fiber degradation is taken into account, the most efficient strategy is to manufacture the component in CFRP and recycle it using solvolysis. This thesis shows that the LCEO methodology can be used as a tool for designers to include the recyclability in an early phase of the product development. Future challenges concern the development of industrial recycling of fiber reinforced plastics where the fiber degradation is minimized.