Sökning: "Bilateral Investment Treaties"

Visar resultat 1 - 5 av 31 uppsatser innehållade orden Bilateral Investment Treaties.

  1. 1. Protections Against Direct and Indirect Expropriation - How the United States and the European Union use Sanctions and Bilateral Investment Treaties to Protect Intellectual Property

    Magister-uppsats, Lunds universitet/Institutionen för handelsrätt

    Författare :George Walley; [2023]
    Nyckelord :United States of America; European Union; Russia; Intellectual Property; Sanctions; Bilateral Investment Treaties; Direct Expropriation; Indirect Expropriation.; Law and Political Science;

    Sammanfattning : This paper presents an overview of how the United States and the European Union use their sanctions and Bilateral Investment Treaty policies to protect intellectual property rights overseas from expropriation. Both territories’ policies vary, with American rightsholders more capable of protecting their overseas intellectual property through the United States’ sanctions policy; European Union investors, conversely, are more likely to benefit from Bilateral Investment Treaties signed by the Member States and third countries. LÄS MER

  2. 2. Charting fossil fuel investment protection in the EU beyond the Energy Charter Treaty

    Uppsats för yrkesexamina på avancerad nivå, Lunds universitet/Juridiska institutionen; Lunds universitet/Juridiska fakulteten

    Författare :Sofia Gierow; [2023]
    Nyckelord :public international law; EU law; international investment law; Energy Charter Treaty; foreign direct investment; bilateral investment treaty; fossil fuels; fair and equitable treatment; expropriation; legitimate expectations; Law and Political Science;

    Sammanfattning : Under international law, foreign direct investments are protected by a patchwork of bilateral or multilateral investment treaties. International investment agreements have been criticised for protecting foreign direct fossil fuel investments and limiting the regulatory space of host states, thus creating obstacles for a green transition. LÄS MER

  3. 3. Skiljeförfaranden vid EU-interna investeringstvister - En analys av rättslägets utveckling efter domen C-284/16 Achmea

    Uppsats för yrkesexamina på avancerad nivå, Lunds universitet/Juridiska institutionen; Lunds universitet/Juridiska fakulteten

    Författare :Philip Sänneskog; [2023]
    Nyckelord :EU-rätt; internationell privat- och processrätt; Skiljeförfarande; Achmea; Komstroy; PL Holdings; Investeringsrätt; Law and Political Science;

    Sammanfattning : I C-284/16 Achmea slog EU-domstolen fast att en skiljeklausul i ett bilateralt investeringsavtal mellan två medlemsstater i den Europeiska unionen var ogiltigt och att den skiljedom som följde av avtalet därav skulle ogiltigförklaras. Domstolen ansåg att skiljeklausuler i investeringsavtal mellan två medlemsstater utgör en metod för att undandra en tvist som rör tolkning och tillämpning av unionsrätt från det domstolssystem som unionen byggt upp genom fördragen. LÄS MER

  4. 4. BITing Back - A Study of the Conditions for Respondent State Counterclaims in Investor-State Investment Arbitration under Bilateral Investment Treaties

    Uppsats för yrkesexamina på avancerad nivå, Lunds universitet/Juridiska institutionen; Lunds universitet/Juridiska fakulteten

    Författare :Anna Perklev; [2023]
    Nyckelord :public international law; international investment law; international investment arbitration; respondent state counterclaims; counterclaims; bilateral investment treaties; treaty arbitration; ICSID; UNCITRAL; ICC; SCC; Law and Political Science;

    Sammanfattning : In this thesis, I present a study of the conditions for a respondent state to introduce counterclaims in the same arbitration as an investor’s initial claim in a dispute arising from a Bilateral Investment Agreement (BIT). The study shows that although the most widely used procedural frameworks for arbitration explicitly allow for counterclaims, tribunals have adopted a restrictive approach to counterclaims, generally rejecting them, even when the arbitration clause in the relevant BIT has been drafted in a way that leaves open the possibility for the tribunal to rule on other disputes than solely the ones arising from an alleged breach of the host state’s treaty obligations towards the foreign investor. LÄS MER

  5. 5. Exchanging Bilateral Investment Treaties and Investor-State Dispute Settlement for the Acquis Communautaire : A three-stage analysis of the effects for investors, the level of investment protection and for the flow of Foreign Direct Investment on the internal market

    Uppsats för yrkesexamina på avancerad nivå, Stockholms universitet/Juridiska institutionen

    Författare :Carl Oscarsson; [2022]
    Nyckelord :;

    Sammanfattning : Through the judgements of Achmea and PL Holdings, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has prohibited the use of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) as well as the enforcement of any awards stemming from such procedures within the European Union (EU). This means that investors on the internal market can no longer enjoy the protection which was awarded to them by the protection standards inherent in the Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) which were previously relied upon by investors in the Member States (MS), and which provided for the possibility of ISDS. LÄS MER